Nos films / some of our films

How can you help the victims of Tropical Storm Ketsana (Ondoy) in the Philippines?

The authors of this blog, Marie Boti and Malcolm Guy, are long time members of the Centre d’appui aux Philippines / Centre for Philippine Concerns (CAP-CPC). We provide this information for those wanting to know how to help the flood victims in the Philippines, and who want to be sure their money will get quickly to the people who need it most. The CAP-CPC has been working in solidarity with the Philippine people for over 25 years.

Donate to the Centre for Philippine Concerns via PayPal to help the flood victims.

Faire un don au Centre d’appui aux Philippines via PayPal pour les victimes des inondations.

If you would like to pay by check:
In Montreal, please make the checks payable to Centre for Philippine Concerns (ou Centre d’appui aux Philippines). Make sure you put “Philippine flood relief” or “pour les victimes des inondations aux Philippines” on the memo line.

For those who need tax receipts, make the check payable to the Montreal-based St. Paul’s Anglican Church or the United Church of Canada – again please indicate on the memo line: “Philippine flood relief”. You can only get a tax receipt if you donate more than $20. Please include full name and address to the person who collects the check.

Q: Where do I send/drop off the checks/cash?

A: In Montreal you can drop off your checks/cash at:

Immigrant Workers’ Centre
6420 Avenue Victoria, suite 9

Montreal, Quebec
H3W 2S7
Tel: +1 514 342-2111
(right beside Metro Plamondon)

St. Paul’s Anglican Church
3970 Côte Ste-Catherine
Montreal, Quebec
H3T 1E3
Tel: +1 514 733-2908
(near Metro Côte Ste-Catherine)

and in the West Island at:

Beaconsfield United Church
202 Woodside Road
Beaconsfield, QC
H9W 2P1
Tel: +1 514 695-0600
www.bucweb.info

For other Canadian cities please see list of contacts here: http://cap-cpc.blogspot.com/2009/09/you-have-undoubtedly-seen-amazing.html

Q: Are you accepting only cash donations? Are you also collecting food and clothing?

A: Cash donations are fast and easy to send to the Philippines – it will get to the people who need it the most in the fastest time possible. BUT, we will not turn other items away. You can drop off food, clothing and other items at the same addresses as above. We are also trying to work with churches and groups in the West Island, South Shore & Chateauguay and other areas. We will be informing people soon where the drop-off centres for relief goods are in these areas. We ask that people help raise money for the cost of delivering the goods.

Q: Who are your partners in the Philippines? Where do the donations go?

A: Our partners in the Philippines are people’s organizations that have been doing work in the areas that have been affected the most by the flooding. They have a long history of organizing and service in these communities. They are organizations in sectors such as migrants, women, urban poor, workers, and church people. Our partners are the National Council of Churches of the Philippines (NCCP), BAYAN allied organizations such as Gabriela, and Migrante International. These organizations are currently engaged in various relief efforts in the most affected areas and with people who have need the help most.

Natural disasters: what a difference a political system can make!

4F21499A-B7EC-4047-B8CA-E65B736C617D.jpg

Photo taken in Marikina, Philippines for BULATLAT by a friend, King Catoy.

While the Philippines emerges from the destruction and loss of life as a result of Typhoon Ondoy (Ketsana), it’s worth reflecting on the difference a political system can make. Take Cuba for example, where evacuation plans are organized well in advance… and damaged property is replaced at no cost?!

For details on how the Cuban disaster relief plan works, see: International Policy Report: Why Cuba’s disaster relief model is worth careful study (May 2009)

No celebration of occupation: open letter to Toronto International Film Festival

I (Malcolm Guy) signed an open letter (with dozens of filmmakers and artists – it’s now reached over 1000!! ) to the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) to protest its celebratory spotlight on Tel Aviv. The letter was drafted by an ad hoc committee made up of: Udi Aloni, filmmaker, Israel; Elle Flanders, filmmaker, Canada; Richard Fung, video artist, Canada; John Greyson, filmmaker, Canada; Naomi Klein, writer and filmmaker, Canada; Kathy Wazana, filmmaker, Canada; Cynthia Wright, writer and academic, Canada; b h Yael, film and video artist, Canada. It reads:

September 2, 2009

As members of the Canadian and international film, culture and media arts communities, we are deeply disturbed by the Toronto International Film Festival’s decision to host a celebratory spotlight on Tel Aviv. We protest that TIFF, whether intentionally or not, has become complicit in the Israeli propaganda machine.

In 2008, the Israeli government and Canadian partners Sidney Greenberg of Astral Media, David Asper of Canwest Global Communications and Joel Reitman of MIJO Corporation launched “Brand Israel,” a million dollar media and advertising campaign aimed at changing Canadian perceptions of Israel. Brand Israel would take the focus off Israel’s treatment of Palestinians and its aggressive wars, and refocus it on achievements in medicine, science and culture. An article in Canadian Jewish News quotes Israeli consul general Amir Gissin as saying that Toronto would be the test city for a promotion that could then be deployed around the world. According to Gissin, the culmination of the campaign would be a major Israeli presence at the 2009 Toronto International Film Festival. (Andy Levy-Alzenkopf, “Brand Israel set to launch in GTA,” Canadian Jewish News, August 28, 2008.)

In 2009, TIFF announced that it would inaugurate its new City to City program with a focus on Tel Aviv. According to program notes by Festival co-director and City to City programmer Cameron Bailey, “The ten films in this year’s City to City programme will showcase the complex currents running through today’s Tel Aviv. Celebrating its 100th birthday in 2009, Tel Aviv is a young, dynamic city that, like Toronto, celebrates its diversity.”

The emphasis on ‘diversity‘ in City to City is empty given the absence of Palestinian filmmakers in the program. Furthermore, what this description does not say is that Tel Aviv is built on destroyed Palestinian villages, and that the city of Jaffa, Palestine’s main cultural hub until 1948, was annexed to Tel Aviv after the mass exiling of the Palestinian population. This program ignores the suffering of thousands of former residents and descendants of the Tel Aviv/Jaffa area who currently live in refugee camps in the Occupied Territories or who have been dispersed to other countries, including Canada. Looking at modern, sophisticated Tel Aviv without also considering the city’s past and the realities of Israeli occupation of the West Bank and the Gaza strip, would be like rhapsodizing about the beauty and elegant lifestyles in white-only Cape Town or Johannesburg during apartheid without acknowledging the corresponding black townships of Khayelitsha and Soweto.

We do not protest the individual Israeli filmmakers included in City to City, nor do we in any way suggest that Israeli films should be unwelcome at TIFF. However, especially in the wake of this year’s brutal assault on Gaza, we object to the use of such an important international festival in staging a propaganda campaign on behalf of what South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu, former U.S. President Jimmy Carter, and UN General Assembly President Miguel d’Escoto Brockmann have all characterized as an apartheid regime.

See list of signatories and responses to the letter at: http://torontodeclaration.blogspot.com/2009/09/toronto-declaration-no-celebration-of.html
To add your name to this letter, please send your name, occupation and country to tiff.letter@gmail.com

Excellent reference site on struggle in Lalgarh, West Bengal

A very comprehensive background and reference site on the continuing struggle in and around Lalgarh, West Bengal, can now be found at:
http://www.bannedthought.net/India/Lalgarh/index.htm

Thanks to Doug Norberg for the link !

NEPAL: Comrade Prachanda’s address in London

Excerpt in English from a speech by Comrade Prachanda, former Nepalese Prime Minister and leading member of the UCPM-Maoist. He spoke in London on Monday, August 10, 2009 at an event organized by Nepali Samaj UK. Prachanda talks about creatively applying Marxist-Leninist and Maoist strategy to the revolution underway in Nepal.

Please find below the transcription of this video kindly provided by OSP, a collaborator of KASAMA Project, at this link: http://mikeely.wordpress.com/2009/08/13/prachandas-london-talk-transcription/

Prachanda speech at Woolwich Town Hall, London August 10, 2009

We are completely aware, we are fully aware that we have a very big responsibility and we have real historical opportunity and challenge right now we are facing. And we understand the concern of our fraternal comrades in other parties and institutions, that they are very much concerned about the future of the Nepalese revolution.

Either it will go ahead in a very creative and a very scientific way, or it will deviate from (inaudible) fundamental theory and fundamental ideology. I am very clear in my mind that we will not deviate because we are trying our best to apply this theory according the conditions of 21st century.

We understand the whole dynamics of 21st century, and we in Nepal, together have leading a very special, very specific type of revolution. Although there are so many ups and downs, and twists and turns in the process necessarily, but ultimately we are trying to lead this revolution according to the changed condition.

And we derived, I think when we were in the war, (inaudible) just after 5 years of the initiation of people’s war, we tried to understand the whole lesson of 20th century, all the revolution and counter-revolution, all the positive and negative lesson of the revolution. And we came to a new understanding. We came to a new conclusion that, we had to develop some new strategy and tactics we cannot copy the insurrectionist strategy of Lenin, and mechanically we cannot copy the whole theory of protracted people’s war according to our conditions.

Therefore, we tried to develop something new, and we tried to something new although in fundamental sense, in basic sense.

We are clear that we fighting against feudalism and imperialism, and we are leading the New Democratic revolution. We have not any kinds of doubt in these basic questions.

But to lead this revolution, we should have to develop some new strategy and new tactics according to the (inaudible) situation, therefore we developed this competitive politics, you know?

We developed some new kinds of military strategy at that time, and we with the fusion of this protracted people’s war and insurrectionist tactics. We tried to create something new,a series of tactics.

At that time we said we would have to demand for the election of the constituent assembly just after 5 years of the people’s war. We developed this series of tactics.: (Inaudble), constituent assembly, republican state, and overall restructure of the state. And (inaudible), just after the synthesis of our ideology and the series of ideas, we departed on the Prachanda Path according to the concrete path of the Nepalese revolution.

We never advocated that this is the path for all the proletariat all over the world.

What demanded at that time, and what we concluded that we should have to develop some series of ideas, and this idea led us for the peace negotiation and the struggle on different fronts. And we derived that revolution cannot be repeated, it can only developed.

One method problem with the communist movement: We try to mechanically follow the strategy and tactics of the Russian revolution or Chinese revolution.

But a revolution cannot be repeated, it can only be developed.

Paris commune could not be repeated in October socialist revolution of Russia, it can only be developed. If Lenin had not been able to develop this ideology to the level of Leninism, Russian revolution could not succeed. In the same way, if Mao Tse-tung would not been able to develop this ideology to the level of Mao Tse-tung Thought first and Maoism in the second period, mainly during the period of the Cultural Revolution, Chinese revolution could not succeed.

Therefore, we communists in Nepal, we understand our responsibility, our proletarian duty. We have not deviated from our fundamental duty, but we are trying our best to develop this ideology, to develop some new strategy and tactics according to the situation, and we are fully confident that we will lead the revolution to success.

And we want to contribute something new, per the new (inaudible), per the whole communist movement and all the revolutions.

We are fully aware of this duty of the proletarian internationalists.

Therefore I want to assure you, let us come to the debate, let us come in a very creative interaction, because the Nepalese revolution has created something new!

Maybe there are some sort of comments, maybe there are some negative lessons, maybe there are.

But in an overall sense, we think that we are trying to develop our ideology according to the situations of the 21st century because we are fully confident that the 21st century will be the century of the world revolution. We are trying our best to contribute to this revolution from this small country.

Thank you very much. Thank you.